home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
oct94.doc
/
000037_owner-lightwave-l _Tue Oct 4 23:57:14 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id WAA18563; Tue, 4 Oct 1994 22:10:15 -0700
Received: from bigdog.engr.arizona.edu by mail.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id WAA18555; Tue, 4 Oct 1994 22:10:11 -0700
Received: by bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA22576; Tue, 4 Oct 1994 22:11:31 -0700
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 22:11:30 -0700 (MST)
From: Eric Case <eric@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu>
To: Steve Koren <koren@hpfcogv.fc.hp.com>
Cc: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Image Size
In-Reply-To: <9410041349.AA07503@hpfcogv.fc.hp.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.941004215919.21174B-100000@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
On Tue, 4 Oct 1994, Steve Koren wrote:
>
SNIP
>
> I hope you didn't mean that Newtek would put virtual memory in Lightwave
> itself. IMHO, this would be a needless duplication of effort, since the
> existing VM solutions work just fine now, and they could spend that same
I think it would be more like photoshop not a full VM, in that only
lightwave would see it. This would also mean that everyone (WinNT, Amiga,
SGI, etc.) would have the same way to solve the problem, this would help
tech support.
> effort improving other things instead of reinventing the wheel (see
> also: file requesters :-). Also, there is always the risk of their
Would the Amiga file requesters show up on WinNT or SGI??
> solution conflicting with the system's use of virtual memory. I for one
> hope they don't go off and re-invent things like virtual memory, ARexx
> for Windoze, or the ability to write a bazillion image formats directly
> from LW, but instead work on things which are actually *new* and which
> you can't fix by adding other software such as VMM or post-process
> tools like ImageFX.
So should the lens flare come out because is could be done in photpshop??
Just my $0.02 don't spend it all in one place. :)
-Eric
>
> - steve
>
--
Eric Case INTERNET: eric@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu